Doxastic Voluntarism

Don't know how long this video will stay on YouTube but I'd love to see footage of this woman when somone tells her that her rant is online for all the world to see.

But seriously, why do you think it is that some people go around assuming that it's a choice to believe or disbelieve? And that the opposite choice is morally wrong, not just a matter of opinion. Isn't it more plausible to just assume that the evidence strikes different people in different ways? (Sure, you can run Pascal's Wager but most intellectually honest religious people would admit that that's doing violence to one's epistemic apparatus.)