25 March, 2007

Telling Lies for God

Fred Nile is probably the most abhorrent figure in Australian politics today. I still haven't got over the 2004 Federal election when he described making the age-of-consent for homosexual sex equal with heterosexual sex as "good news for paedophiles"! (A Greens policy that the Labor government picked up and passed.) As nasty as that deception was, their policy was just maintaining the status quo, as it is when they want to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples and exempt religious schools from anti-discrimination laws. But this election they became worse than ultra-conservative, they became openly regressive, particularly Nile's suggestion of a moratorium on Muslim immigration in favour of taking in more Christians. I can't believe that he can say that with a straight face. This clearly puts him in the same league as One Nation yet the major parties won't distance themselves from him the way they agreed to preference Pauline last. Such is the nature of religion in Australia, although few Australians practice it with any sincerity, it still lends a gloss of respectability to xenophobia.

When I saw this video before the NSW election last weekend I just found it funny. But now it has more of a bitter taste because the Christian Democrats have increased their vote statewide and even out-polled the Greens in a few seats around where I used to live. It doesn't make any immediate difference because they won't take any lower-house seats and they're getting no new upper house seats. But it's indicative of a trend towards an American style fusion of religion and politics and that's terrifying.

4 Comments:

At 26 Mar 2007, 3:24:00 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course everyone has the right to their own opinion, but I truly think the world would be a much healthier and egalitarian place to live in if Rev Nile had a heart attack and died.

 
At 26 Mar 2007, 10:37:00 am, Blogger Nick said...

If he did die, the party could just appoint someone to take his seat, without a byelection. (As they did when he ran for the Senate in 2004. I think it's supposed to be the next person down on the ballot, ie Gary Raymond or, if he and Brian Watters decline, it could be June Dally-Watkins!)

I have heard that there's some sort of factional (theological?) differences between Nile and Gordon Moyes so it's hard to say whether Fred's replacement would be better or worse.

 
At 27 Mar 2007, 12:40:00 am, Blogger Lara said...

There was a man from my church handing out how-to-vote sheets for the CDP when my parents and I went to vote on Saturday. We almost completely ignored him, but by accident. I said that I don't tend to pay attention to people handing out political propaganda. I find it scary when Christians think that Christians should vote for the CDP simply because it's the "Christian" party.

 
At 28 Mar 2007, 10:35:00 am, Blogger Nick said...

Nile's whole political approach is based on the assumptions that 1. Australia should be a Christian country; and 2. That it's ok to tell lies (or at least to mislead the public), so long as it furthers his cause.

When you contrast this with the fact that most practising Christians are quite sincere in their beliefs, it seems strange that any of them would want to support such a man.

As Descartes said, 'If... he is induced to embrace them by fallacious arguments... he will not on that account be a true believer, but will instead be committing a sin by not using his reason correctly. And I think that all orthodox theologians have always taken a similar view on this matter.' (AT 148) Those Jesuits did a good job with Descartes!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home