Why are so many on the Religious Right gay?
Did anyone else read this in the Herald? Seems a Family First candidate has been disendorsed because of his appearance on a gay porn site, in contradiction with their strongly anti-porn policy. I love his defence, that it wasn't his penis in the photo, that it must have been Photoshopped in.
I found the story particularly interesting because I kinda know that Andrew Quah. He edits on Wikipedia. His main thing is removing accusations of religiosity from Family First's page. In fact, he's probably the best one for such a job because he's not a member of the Assemblies of God. In fact, he considers himself an atheist, no less! (Raised Buddhist, he says, which he considers an atheistic religion. I don't think he practises anymore.) I always found this a little confusing but I suppose there's more than a few non-religious people who appropriate the "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve" fallacy.
What I don't understand is how such a person can justify such anti-feminism without Ephesians. I'm glad such an insecure individual is not going to hold office. It's bad enough that our PM thinks gay men getting married will make him love his wife less, we don't need any more people like that in parliament.